Below are some Frequently Asked Questions in regards to Institutional Review Board policies, procedures and processes. If your question is not answered below, please contact the IRB.
»Frequently Asked Questions
+-What is the Role/Expectation of the Faculty Advisor/Mentor for undergraduate/graduate research?
The IRB specifies that a Chapman University faculty member must assume the primary role in completing and submitting a research application/protocol for review to the IRB. While students (undergraduate and graduate) may serve as the investigator on any research project, it is the responsibility of the Faculty advisor/mentor to:
- Determine whether projects require IRB review and assist students with the process
- Assure that all elements of the IRB protocol and application are completed thoroughly and accurately
- Assure that all Informed Consent/Assent documents, Recruitment documents, Instructional documents, etc., related to the study are written clearly (proper grammar, proper reading level for the intended potential participants) and are sufficient in explanation and details to assure that potential subjects are fully informed of all elements of the research that pertain to their participation.
- Serve as the primary contact person for the IRB
Faculty advisors/mentors are also tasked with ensuring students understand the principles of research ethics. As mentioned in the CITI Training modules, faculty members who supervise student research are ultimately responsible for the protection of human subjects and must:
- Be familiar with the ethical and regulatory requirements of human subjects research and discuss research ethics with the students
- Monitor student projects, paying special attention to maintaining confidentiality, privacy, level of risk, voluntary participation and withdrawal, and informed consent
- Assure that any unexpected or adverse events are reported to the IRB
Please keep in mind that incomplete or insufficient applications will not only delay your own review and approval process but the review and approval process of your colleagues and any other Chapman University faculty/researchers. Incomplete or rushed applications consume the time and resources of the IRB staff and review team.
+-Is there a difference between "Compensation" and "Benefits"?
+-What is the difference between Anonymous and Confidential Data Collection?
Anonymous means that you will not be receiving or collecting any identifying information about or from the subject(s) and you will have no means to contact the subject and no follow-up will be initiated. Subjects consenting to participate in anonymous research will be provided with consenting information but DO NOT sign the consent document. The subject's agreement to participate is considered passive consent.
When subject research data is collected in a confidential manner, the subject's identifying information may be used to correlate specific serial or grouped data or to contact the subject for follow-up procedures or interviews. To protect the subject's confidential information, all identifying data should be coded so as not to be linked with the subject's individual responses in the final analysis.
+-Is a witness signature required when obtaining informed consent from a research subject?
+-I'm an Undergraduate student. How can I submit an application to perform a research project?
Undergraduate students may be listed on research applications as co-investigator student researchers. Undergraduate research requires supervision from a faculty or staff sponsor, usually in the form of a class instructor.
The IRB requires that the faculty or staff sponsor review the IRB application for completeness and provide direct supervision when developing and submitting undergraduate research applications.
Undergraduate research is generally conducted to meet a course assignment such as the capstone requirement, through a research internship, as part of a team research project, or as part of a larger research project funded by an internal or external source. In order to submit a protocol, students must complete the NIH research tutorial identified on the Chapman University IRB Training webpage.
+-I have several approved modifications to my original research application. Do my modifications change the expiration date from when my application was originally approved?
+-What is the difference between Consent and Assent?
"Consent" to participate in a research study can only be given by competent individuals who have reached the legal age of consent (typically 18 years old in the U.S.) and have been given sufficient information of the nature, benefits and risks of participation to form a reasoned decision.
"Assent" in general, is the agreement or expression of willingness of a minor (or individual who is not able to give legal consent) to participate in a research study. Assent given by a minor must be accompanied by informed consent obtained from the subject's parent(s) or legal guardian(s).
+-Do I need to print out and use the copy of the consent form that shows the IRB approval stamp when consenting subjects?
Yes, the consent form used to consent subjects must show the IRB assigned number, approval and expiration dates, and IRB certification. Consent forms without the IRB information or certification are not valid for use.
Make sure, when requesting modifications, that you change the information or instructions provided in the consent form so that the most current version is used for all new subject enrollment. If changes in the consent form affect currently enrolled subjects, re-consenting of these subjects should be done at their next scheduled study visit or as soon as possible to inform the subject of any changes affecting their continued participation.
+-Does my research qualify as Exempt, Expedited or for Full Committee Review?
For research to qualify as "Exempt" from the Code of Federal Regulations pertaining to the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46 full text), the research must be considered minimal risk and the only involvement of human subjects falls within one of six categories listed in 45 CFR 46.101. Please review those six categories here: Exempt Research Categories.
For research to qualify for "Expedited" review, the research must present no more than minimal privacy, psychological, and/or physical risk to human subjects, and involve only procedures listed in one or more of the expedited categories listed here: Expedited Research Categories, as defined by the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP).
Please note that research that is included in the Expedited categories list merely means that the research is eligible for expedited review, but full committee may be required if the IRB committee deems it necessary.
If the study does not qualify as Exempt or Expedited as described above, full committee review is required.
+-Should I submit my entire research proposal/thesis with my research protocol application to the IRB?
+-I am not sure if the research I want to do qualifies as prospective or retrospective research. What is the difference?
Retrospective studies pose a question and look back. Retrospective studies use information that has usually been collected for reasons other than research, such as administrative data and archival and publically available records. Therefore, the outcome of interest has already occurred (or not) by the time the study is started.
Prospective studies ask a question and look forward. Prospective studies are designed before any information is collected. Study subjects are identified (e.g., new mothers returning to work and obstacles to childcare) and followed forward to see if the outcome of interest (summary of questions asked and answered) happens over time. This outcome is assessed relative to the intervention factor (e.g., managing obstacles to childcare, etc.).